Biochemists and biomedical scientists vs Finance and investment analysts and advisers Salary (2025)

How do Biochemists and biomedical scientists and Finance and investment analysts and advisers salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Finance and investment analysts and advisers earns £3,777 more per year (8% higher)
vs

Detailed Comparison

MetricBiochemists and biomedical scientistsFinance and investment analysts and advisersDifference
Median Annual£44,964£48,741-£3,777
Mean Annual£48,246£56,553-£8,307
Monthly£3,747£4,062-£315
Weekly£865£937-£72
Hourly£21.62£23.43-£1.81

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileBiochemists and biomedical scientistsFinance and investment analysts and advisers
10th (Entry)£26,888£27,441
25th£34,173£34,929
50th (Median)£44,964£48,741
75th£55,452£68,909
90th (Senior)£0£90,005
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Biochemists and biomedical scientists or a Finance and investment analysts and advisers?
A Finance and investment analysts and advisers earns more. The median salary for a Biochemists and biomedical scientists is £44,964, whilst a Finance and investment analysts and advisers earns £48,741 — a difference of £3,777 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Biochemists and biomedical scientists and a Finance and investment analysts and advisers?
The difference is £3,777 per year. Finance and investment analysts and advisers is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Biochemists and biomedical scientists or a Finance and investment analysts and advisers?
From a salary perspective, Finance and investment analysts and advisers offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons