Biochemists and biomedical scientists vs Medical Practitioners Salary (2025)

How do Biochemists and biomedical scientists and Medical Practitioners salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Medical Practitioners earns £25,756 more per year (57% higher)
vs

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year

Detailed Comparison

MetricBiochemists and biomedical scientistsMedical PractitionersDifference
Median Annual£44,964£70,720-£25,756
Mean Annual£48,246£80,274-£32,028
Monthly£3,747£5,893-£2,146
Weekly£865£1,360-£495
Hourly£21.62£34.00-£12.38

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileBiochemists and biomedical scientistsMedical Practitioners
10th (Entry)£26,888£37,220
25th£34,173£51,611
50th (Median)£44,964£70,720
75th£55,452£98,599
90th (Senior)£0£136,670
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Biochemists and biomedical scientists or a Medical Practitioners?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Biochemists and biomedical scientists is £44,964, whilst a Medical Practitioners earns £70,720 — a difference of £25,756 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Biochemists and biomedical scientists and a Medical Practitioners?
The difference is £25,756 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Biochemists and biomedical scientists or a Medical Practitioners?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons