Chemical scientists vs Financial accounts managers Salary (2025)

How do Chemical scientists and Financial accounts managers salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Financial accounts managers earns £4,566 more per year (11% higher)

Chemical scientists

£39,834
per year
vs

Financial accounts managers

£44,400
per year

Detailed Comparison

MetricChemical scientistsFinancial accounts managersDifference
Median Annual£39,834£44,400-£4,566
Mean Annual£45,616£49,999-£4,383
Monthly£3,320£3,700-£380
Weekly£766£854-£88
Hourly£19.15£21.35-£2.20

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileChemical scientistsFinancial accounts managers
10th (Entry)£25,928£25,193
25th£32,226£34,147
50th (Median)£39,834£44,400
75th£50,662£59,965
90th (Senior)£0£78,729
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Chemical scientists or a Financial accounts managers?
A Financial accounts managers earns more. The median salary for a Chemical scientists is £39,834, whilst a Financial accounts managers earns £44,400 — a difference of £4,566 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Chemical scientists and a Financial accounts managers?
The difference is £4,566 per year. Financial accounts managers is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Chemical scientists or a Financial accounts managers?
From a salary perspective, Financial accounts managers offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons