Finance and investment analysts and advisers vs Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. Salary (2025)

How do Finance and investment analysts and advisers and Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Finance and investment analysts and advisers earns £13,749 more per year (39% higher)
vs

Detailed Comparison

MetricFinance and investment analysts and advisersScience, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.Difference
Median Annual£48,741£34,992+£13,749
Mean Annual£56,553£37,397+£19,156
Monthly£4,062£2,916+£1,146
Weekly£937£673+£264
Hourly£23.43£16.82+£6.61

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileFinance and investment analysts and advisersScience, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.
10th (Entry)£27,441£22,145
25th£34,929£28,527
50th (Median)£48,741£34,992
75th£68,909£45,224
90th (Senior)£90,005£55,702
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Finance and investment analysts and advisers or a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
A Finance and investment analysts and advisers earns more. The median salary for a Finance and investment analysts and advisers is £48,741, whilst a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. earns £34,992 — a difference of £13,749 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Finance and investment analysts and advisers and a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
The difference is £13,749 per year. Finance and investment analysts and advisers is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Finance and investment analysts and advisers or a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
From a salary perspective, Finance and investment analysts and advisers offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons