Finance officers vs Medical Practitioners Salary

How do Finance officers and Medical Practitioners salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown using the latest ONS data.

Medical Practitioners earns £41,468 more per year (142% higher)

Finance officers

£29,252
per year (gross)
Take-home: £24,581
vs

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year (gross)
Take-home: £51,575

Detailed Comparison

MetricFinance officersMedical PractitionersDifference
Median Annual£29,252£70,720-£41,468
Mean Annual£29,539£80,274-£50,735
Take-Home (Net)£24,581£51,575-£26,994
Monthly (Gross)£2,438£5,893-£3,455
Weekly (Gross)£563£1,360-£797
Hourly£14.06£34.00-£19.94

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileFinance officersMedical Practitioners
10th (Entry)£15,237£37,220
25th£23,747£51,611
50th (Median)£29,252£70,720
75th£35,822£98,599
90th (Senior)£0£136,670

Compare Other Jobs

vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Finance officers or a Medical Practitioners?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Finance officers is £29,252, whilst a Medical Practitioners earns £70,720 — a difference of £41,468 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Finance officers and a Medical Practitioners?
The difference is £41,468 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
What is the take-home pay difference?
After tax and National Insurance, a Finance officers takes home approximately £24,581 per year, whilst a Medical Practitioners takes home £51,575. The net difference is £26,994.
Should I become a Finance officers or a Medical Practitioners?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons