Medical Practitioners vs Newspaper and periodical editors Salary (2025)

How do Medical Practitioners and Newspaper and periodical editors salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Medical Practitioners earns £27,264 more per year (63% higher)

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year
vs

Detailed Comparison

MetricMedical PractitionersNewspaper and periodical editorsDifference
Median Annual£70,720£43,456+£27,264
Mean Annual£80,274£48,684+£31,590
Monthly£5,893£3,621+£2,272
Weekly£1,360£836+£524
Hourly£34.00£20.89+£13.11

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileMedical PractitionersNewspaper and periodical editors
10th (Entry)£37,220£27,233
25th£51,611£33,719
50th (Median)£70,720£43,456
75th£98,599£55,473
90th (Senior)£136,670£0
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Medical Practitioners or a Newspaper and periodical editors?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Medical Practitioners is £70,720, whilst a Newspaper and periodical editors earns £43,456 — a difference of £27,264 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Medical Practitioners and a Newspaper and periodical editors?
The difference is £27,264 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Medical Practitioners or a Newspaper and periodical editors?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons