Medical Practitioners vs Physical scientists Salary (2025)
How do Medical Practitioners and Physical scientists salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.
Medical Practitioners earns £21,186 more per year (43% higher)
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Medical Practitioners | Physical scientists | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual | £70,720 | £49,534 | +£21,186 |
| Mean Annual | £80,274 | £56,902 | +£23,372 |
| Monthly | £5,893 | £4,128 | +£1,765 |
| Weekly | £1,360 | £953 | +£407 |
| Hourly | £34.00 | £23.81 | +£10.19 |
Advertisement
Frequently Asked Questions
Who earns more, a Medical Practitioners or a Physical scientists?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Medical Practitioners is £70,720, whilst a Physical scientists earns £49,534 — a difference of £21,186 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Medical Practitioners and a Physical scientists?
The difference is £21,186 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Medical Practitioners or a Physical scientists?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.
More Comparisons
Medical Practitioners vs Marketing associate professionalsPhysical scientists vs Marketing associate professionalsMedical Practitioners vs Vehicle and parts salespersons and advisersPhysical scientists vs Vehicle and parts salespersons and advisersMedical Practitioners vs Interior designersPhysical scientists vs Interior designersMedical Practitioners vs Construction and Building TradesPhysical scientists vs Construction and Building Trades