Medical Practitioners vs Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. Salary (2025)

How do Medical Practitioners and Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Medical Practitioners earns £35,728 more per year (102% higher)

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year
vs

Detailed Comparison

MetricMedical PractitionersScience, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.Difference
Median Annual£70,720£34,992+£35,728
Mean Annual£80,274£37,397+£42,877
Monthly£5,893£2,916+£2,977
Weekly£1,360£673+£687
Hourly£34.00£16.82+£17.18

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileMedical PractitionersScience, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.
10th (Entry)£37,220£22,145
25th£51,611£28,527
50th (Median)£70,720£34,992
75th£98,599£45,224
90th (Senior)£136,670£55,702
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Medical Practitioners or a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Medical Practitioners is £70,720, whilst a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c. earns £34,992 — a difference of £35,728 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Medical Practitioners and a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
The difference is £35,728 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Medical Practitioners or a Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons