Biological scientists vs Medical Practitioners Salary (2025)
How do Biological scientists and Medical Practitioners salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.
Medical Practitioners earns £27,682 more per year (64% higher)
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Biological scientists | Medical Practitioners | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual | £43,038 | £70,720 | -£27,682 |
| Mean Annual | £49,608 | £80,274 | -£30,666 |
| Monthly | £3,587 | £5,893 | -£2,306 |
| Weekly | £828 | £1,360 | -£532 |
| Hourly | £20.69 | £34.00 | -£13.31 |
Advertisement
Frequently Asked Questions
Who earns more, a Biological scientists or a Medical Practitioners?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Biological scientists is £43,038, whilst a Medical Practitioners earns £70,720 — a difference of £27,682 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Biological scientists and a Medical Practitioners?
The difference is £27,682 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Biological scientists or a Medical Practitioners?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.
More Comparisons
Biological scientists vs IT business analysts, architects and systems designersMedical Practitioners vs IT business analysts, architects and systems designersBiological scientists vs Customer Service SupervisorsMedical Practitioners vs Customer Service SupervisorsBiological scientists vs Packers, bottlers, canners and fillersMedical Practitioners vs Packers, bottlers, canners and fillersBiological scientists vs Chemical scientistsMedical Practitioners vs Chemical scientists