Finance and investment analysts and advisers vs Medical Practitioners Salary (2025)

How do Finance and investment analysts and advisers and Medical Practitioners salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Medical Practitioners earns £21,979 more per year (45% higher)
vs

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year

Detailed Comparison

MetricFinance and investment analysts and advisersMedical PractitionersDifference
Median Annual£48,741£70,720-£21,979
Mean Annual£56,553£80,274-£23,721
Monthly£4,062£5,893-£1,831
Weekly£937£1,360-£423
Hourly£23.43£34.00-£10.57

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileFinance and investment analysts and advisersMedical Practitioners
10th (Entry)£27,441£37,220
25th£34,929£51,611
50th (Median)£48,741£70,720
75th£68,909£98,599
90th (Senior)£90,005£136,670
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Finance and investment analysts and advisers or a Medical Practitioners?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Finance and investment analysts and advisers is £48,741, whilst a Medical Practitioners earns £70,720 — a difference of £21,979 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Finance and investment analysts and advisers and a Medical Practitioners?
The difference is £21,979 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Finance and investment analysts and advisers or a Medical Practitioners?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons