Medical Practitioners vs Social and humanities scientists Salary (2025)
How do Medical Practitioners and Social and humanities scientists salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.
Medical Practitioners earns £34,507 more per year (95% higher)
Detailed Comparison
| Metric | Medical Practitioners | Social and humanities scientists | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Annual | £70,720 | £36,213 | +£34,507 |
| Mean Annual | £80,274 | £41,869 | +£38,405 |
| Monthly | £5,893 | £3,018 | +£2,875 |
| Weekly | £1,360 | £696 | +£664 |
| Hourly | £34.00 | £17.41 | +£16.59 |
Advertisement
Frequently Asked Questions
Who earns more, a Medical Practitioners or a Social and humanities scientists?
A Medical Practitioners earns more. The median salary for a Medical Practitioners is £70,720, whilst a Social and humanities scientists earns £36,213 — a difference of £34,507 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Medical Practitioners and a Social and humanities scientists?
The difference is £34,507 per year. Medical Practitioners is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Medical Practitioners or a Social and humanities scientists?
From a salary perspective, Medical Practitioners offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.
More Comparisons
Medical Practitioners vs Biological scientistsSocial and humanities scientists vs Biological scientistsMedical Practitioners vs Other psychologistsSocial and humanities scientists vs Other psychologistsMedical Practitioners vs Professional occupationsSocial and humanities scientists vs Professional occupationsMedical Practitioners vs Information Technology TechniciansSocial and humanities scientists vs Information Technology Technicians