Information technology directors vs Medical Practitioners Salary

How do Information technology directors and Medical Practitioners salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown using the latest ONS data.

Information technology directors earns £19,953 more per year (28% higher)

Information technology directors

£90,673
per year (gross)
Take-home: £63,148
vs

Medical Practitioners

£70,720
per year (gross)
Take-home: £51,575

Detailed Comparison

MetricInformation technology directorsMedical PractitionersDifference
Median Annual£90,673£70,720+£19,953
Mean Annual£98,161£80,274+£17,887
Take-Home (Net)£63,148£51,575+£11,573
Monthly (Gross)£7,556£5,893+£1,663
Weekly (Gross)£1,744£1,360+£384
Hourly£43.59£34.00+£9.59

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileInformation technology directorsMedical Practitioners
10th (Entry)£47,698£37,220
25th£68,523£51,611
50th (Median)£90,673£70,720
75th£120,004£98,599
90th (Senior)£0£136,670

Compare Other Jobs

vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Information technology directors or a Medical Practitioners?
A Information technology directors earns more. The median salary for a Information technology directors is £90,673, whilst a Medical Practitioners earns £70,720 — a difference of £19,953 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Information technology directors and a Medical Practitioners?
The difference is £19,953 per year. Information technology directors is the higher-paid role.
What is the take-home pay difference?
After tax and National Insurance, a Information technology directors takes home approximately £63,148 per year, whilst a Medical Practitioners takes home £51,575. The net difference is £11,573.
Should I become a Information technology directors or a Medical Practitioners?
From a salary perspective, Information technology directors offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons