Barristers and judges vs Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants Salary (2025)

How do Barristers and judges and Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants salaries compare in the UK? Here is a detailed side-by-side breakdown.

Barristers and judges earns £17,110 more per year (47% higher)

Barristers and judges

£53,657
per year
vs

Detailed Comparison

MetricBarristers and judgesChartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultantsDifference
Median Annual£53,657£36,547+£17,110
Mean Annual£61,906£41,848+£20,058
Monthly£4,471£3,046+£1,425
Weekly£1,032£703+£329
Hourly£25.80£17.57+£8.23

Salary Range Comparison

PercentileBarristers and judgesChartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants
10th (Entry)£21,879£24,712
25th£31,204£30,207
50th (Median)£53,657£36,547
75th£71,492£49,201
90th (Senior)£0£0
Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

Who earns more, a Barristers and judges or a Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants?
A Barristers and judges earns more. The median salary for a Barristers and judges is £53,657, whilst a Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants earns £36,547 — a difference of £17,110 per year.
What is the salary difference between a Barristers and judges and a Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants?
The difference is £17,110 per year. Barristers and judges is the higher-paid role.
Should I become a Barristers and judges or a Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants?
From a salary perspective, Barristers and judges offers higher median pay. However, career choice depends on many factors including interests, qualifications, work-life balance and long-term prospects.

More Comparisons